Search for: "State Oil Co. v. Khan" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am by Zak Gowen
  In fact, some of antitrust law’s most foundational precedents, including Northern Securities[9] and Standard Oil,[10] address the very issue. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:21 pm by Josh Wright
The Statement states that “Congress passed the FTC Act to push back against the judiciary’s open-ended rule of reason for analyzing Sherman Act claims” and cites the Supreme Court’s opinion in Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
Khan, it held that maximum resale price fixing is not per se illegal.[21] And, in 2007, the Court held that minimum resale price fixing should also be assessed under the rule of reason. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 3:02 pm by Josh Blackman
So, despite their "increasingly wobbly, moth-eaten foundations," State Oil Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
  People around the world wore gold jewelry proudly, and globe-straddling monetary systems, on which economies were said to be based, were defined around gold and silver objects and debts denominated in weights of those metals.We can think of collectibles as coming at us at two levels, like railroads and trains, or like pipelines and the oil they carry. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 10:39 am by Kent Scheidegger
Because "it is this Court's prerogative alone to overrule one of its precedents," State Oil Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Jimmy Wales, the Wikipedia co-founder, has argued that an attempt by France to give an online privacy ruling global force is opening up a “disastrous can of worms” and could spur global censorship. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:52 pm by Sheppard Mullin
United States, 435 U.S. 679, 692 (1978) (test for per se illegality); accord State Oil Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:52 pm by Sheppard Mullin
United States, 435 U.S. 679, 692 (1978) (test for per se illegality); accord State Oil Co. v. [read post]