Search for: "State Road Department v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 7:21 am by Liisa Speaker
On March 8, 2013, Smith was re-assigned to road patrol.Smith asserted that defendant retaliated against him for publicly criticizing the misuse of the millage revenue by assigning him to road patrol. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Grayson Clary discussed the split circuit court opinions on the government’s authority to search electronic devices at the border, focusing on the Eleventh Circuit’s May 23 ruling in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:49 am by Susan Brenner
That same day, United States Magistrate Judge Gudrun Rice approved the warrant. . . . [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 6:00 am by Yuval Shany, Mordechai Kremnitzer
A complaint to that effect was reviewed by the Justice Ministry inspector of interrogees’ complaints and an accompanying Justice Ministry attorney, and was found to justify a criminal investigation by the Police Internal Investigations Department (PIID), a unit within the ministry authorized to investigate complaints against the Police and ISA. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:21 am
Suvannavejh APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND DEPARTMENT Land Use and Planning Roads' De-Mapping Reversed; Village Arbitrarily Found Roads 'Useless', Failed SEQRA 'Hard Look' Baker v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 9:04 am by Steven Cohen
O’Neal is a wage-and-hour consultant with forty years of experience working in the Wage and Hour Division of the United States Department of Labor. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 10:52 pm
The policy at issue was not a commercial property policy, but a pollution legal liability policy, such as in United States Fire Ins. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 1:12 pm
The Court reaches this conclusion primarily upon reliance on United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 3:09 pm by Cappetta Law Offices
The United States Court of Appeals was charged with deciding whether CROCS pose a heightened risk of escalator entrapment, thus rendering the footwear defective. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
For this reason, a judgment on the merits in a prior action between the same parties bars litigation under a different legal theory (see Dickerson v United Way of N.Y. [read post]