Search for: "State ex rel. Dept. of Transp., Application of"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
”*** In contrast, see Matter of Martin ex rel Lekkas, 86 AD2d 712. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:27 pm
Courts have viewed employees who lack licenses as being “unqualified,” in contrast to being “incompetent,” to perform the duties of the position.In contrast, see Matter of Martin ex rel Lekkas, 86 AD2d 712. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:10 am
Inability to demonstrate the possession of a required license permits the summary termination of an incumbentMatter of Cravatta v New York State Dept. of Transp., 2009 NY Slip Op 51164(U), Decided on May 15, 2009, Supreme Court, Erie County, Judge Paula L. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
With respect to the existence of a “valid license requirement,” see Martin ex rel Lekkas, 86 AD2d 712.** There is another limitation on such “summary” termination, however. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
