Search for: "State ex rel. Griffin v. Doe" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
Cas. at 26.In his opening brief, Donald Trump appeared to preserve this argument, though just barely:  He didn’t devote any space to it.[1]  His reply brief does even less with it than that, offering only the ambiguous sentence “that section 3 may be enforced only though the congressionally enacted methods of enforcement,” without even arguing that Chief Justice Chase got it right in Griffin’s Case. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
  First, it’s likely that many or all of the Justices will want to preserve states’ authority to prevent rebels and insurrectionists from holding state offices, as New Mexico did in the Couy Griffin case currently pending before the Court. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:21 am
By Shannon LandrethThe Indiana Supreme Court issued four opinions in February 2010, two of which addressed related issues.In State ex rel. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 10:06 am by Sandy Levinson
 But, all things considered, it presents fewer dangers than does presidentialism. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:17 am by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
See In re T.R. (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 6, 16 n.9 (adult civil and criminal proceedings are "presumptively open to the public"); State ex rel. [read post]