Search for: "State ex rel. Griffin v. Doe"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 8:46 am
C. 199, 200, 204 (1869) (elected county sheriff); State ex rel. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
First, it’s likely that many or all of the Justices will want to preserve states’ authority to prevent rebels and insurrectionists from holding state offices, as New Mexico did in the Couy Griffin case currently pending before the Court. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
Wisconsin ex rel. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Cas. at 26.In his opening brief, Donald Trump appeared to preserve this argument, though just barely: He didn’t devote any space to it.[1] His reply brief does even less with it than that, offering only the ambiguous sentence “that section 3 may be enforced only though the congressionally enacted methods of enforcement,” without even arguing that Chief Justice Chase got it right in Griffin’s Case. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
M'Clung v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
” Butler v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
" This basic principle, namely that the requirement of probable cause to permit entry into a private home is not excused based upon any relative perceived societal importance, was further articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Mincey v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 10:33 am
Massanari, 266 F.3d 1155, 1172 & n.29 (9th Cir. 2001) (calling en banc proceedings "unwieldy and time-consuming") (internal quotation omitted); Bartlett ex rel. [read post]
13 May 2021, 11:56 am
See State ex rel. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
See In re T.R. (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 6, 16 n.9 (adult civil and criminal proceedings are "presumptively open to the public"); State ex rel. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
See In re T.R. (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 6, 16 n.9 (adult civil and criminal proceedings are "presumptively open to the public"); State ex rel. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 10:06 am
But, all things considered, it presents fewer dangers than does presidentialism. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Relative to the entire caseload of a particular collection law firm, few cases go to trial and if they do, such trials typically take no more than a few minutes. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Griffin, 909 So.2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) [30 Fla. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 10:26 am
Catalina v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Catalina v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
