Search for: "State in Interest of TB"
Results 1 - 20
of 827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2011, 8:15 am
Extensively drug-resistant TB, while relatively rare, has been confirmed in 58 countries, including the United States, and likely is present in many more. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:00 pm
Florida clearly dropped the ball at the state level. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 11:24 am
Mike Stobbe of the AP has an interesting story today looking at various legal issues raised by the situation of an Atlanta personal injury attorney, Andrew Speaker, with drug-resistant TB. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 5:45 am
He estimated that 44 states have updated their laws since. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 4:45 am
It instructed the trial court to consider whether alternative tests for TB which do not involve injecting substances into the body could be used effectively to achieve the state's goals. [read post]
30 May 2007, 10:07 pm
Massachusetts, in which Justice Holmes held that the state's compelling interest in protecting the public health outweighed an individual's Fourteenth Amendment-based liberty interest. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 6:02 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 7:43 am
Defendant’s claim of a state privacy interest in the power usage records was rejected under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 5:52 am
United States v. [read post]
CA9: USPO's delivery guarantee creates no constitutional possessory interest in a package in transit
29 May 2009, 7:10 am
State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 4:26 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
In this inactive state, referred to as latent TB, the disease is not contagious. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 7:12 am
Hernandez, 313 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir. 2002), and a privacy interest in the contents, but not the exterior, of the package, United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 11:36 am
State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 5:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 6:56 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:41 pm
Under our state constitution, "a criminal defendant has standing to move to suppress evidence from a claimed unreasonable search or seizure 'if he has a proprietary, possessory or participatory interest in either the place searched or the property seized.'" State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 5:22 am
All I can say is the video forces you to ask some hard questions and raises interesting facts that I did not know before about 911 and the state of affairs in our nation. [read post]
