Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 13,685
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm
This is the same mistake that the initial Fifth Circuit panel made in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
Rudnick v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 8:32 am
Last month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California attempted to tackle these questions in response to a motion to dismiss in Della v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am
Meanwhile, lower courts struggled with how to fit the Supreme Court’s 1922 decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Worley have posted Evidence that the President is an "Officer of the United States" for Purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment (Southern California Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:57 pm
History of the Case It is reported that the debtor initiated a voluntary Chapter 11 petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California in June 2023. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The court invoked language from the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm
Especially in the western United States, sprawling homeless encampments have become ubiquitous, to the disgust and dismay of local residents. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
And there is no First Amendment exception or California anti-SLAPP law exception for 13 Reasons Why. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am
But bad as we may sincerely, even correctly, believe some of these decisions to be, they are still the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Furthermore, Story would expressly engage in a discussion of the Constitution's "officers of the United States"-language and "office under the United States" three sections later: in Section 791. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 10:19 am
Valiente v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:27 am
We have previously written about both the United States Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUSINESS FEDERATION, CENTRAL VALLEY BUSINESS FEDERATION, and WESTERN GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUSINESS FEDERATION, CENTRAL VALLEY BUSINESS FEDERATION, and WESTERN GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
In 1995 the Court identified state interests that might justify the rules. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
The bill specifically provides that California’s noncompete restrictions trump other states’ laws when an employee seeks employment in California, even if the employee had signed the noncompete while living outside of California and working for a non-California employer. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Finally, Title 10 status occurs when state National Guard units are “federalized” by the president of the United States pursuant to one of the statutory authorities for doing so. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:09 pm
One case highlighted is Gbarabe v. [read post]
