Search for: "State of Florida v. Anderson" Results 221 - 240 of 245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Buie, No. 070258 Sentence of fifteen years for being a felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed where: 1) because the maximum penalty for the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty was ten years or more under state statute, defendant's state felony narcotics conviction qualified as a "serious drug offense" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA); and 2) defendant's allegation that he was deprived of counsel at his plea hearing did not state a… [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Anderson, No. 07-3654 Sentence for bank robbery is affirmed where defendant made no showing in his motion for reconsideration of sentence that his HIV infection had in any way affected his mental capacity at the time of the offense, and it would therefore have been an abuse of discretion for the sentencing court to grant his request for a mental-health evaluation. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Florida (1996), the Secretary of the Interior may establish procedures for Indian gaming if a state declines to enter a compact with the Tribe and invokes immunity from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
Mean BAC level of those arrested were .138% (San Diego), .150% (Florida), and .152% (Colorado). [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:40 am
Attempts to Regulate Payday Lenders Currently, garnishment of social security benefits is illegal and all active-duty military families are protected by the Military Lending Act signed into law on October 2006 - capping interest rates at 36% on all small loans, including payday loans, for all military families.[43] Small loans are governed by state law, and many states have implemented restrictions on payday lenders.[44] For example, many state have placed restrictions… [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:30 pm
Rodriguez Was Remanded Back to State Court, West Virginia University v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 7:22 am
Audio | Listen to Governor Charlie Crist's announcement TALLAHASSEE -- Walt McNeil, who just completed his first year as the state's juvenile justice chief, was given a tough promotion Tuesday when the governor made him the second African American in state history to lead Florida's increasingly burdened prison system. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]