Search for: "State of Florida v. Anderson" Results 141 - 160 of 270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
This was an appeal from the United States District Court for theMiddle District of Florida in No. 3:11-cv-00819-TJC-JRK,Judge Timothy J. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  As the balance of federal and state regulatory authority shifts, at what point is the “tradition” is upended? [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 5:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  THE LAW IN NEW JERSEY   We should expect a high court ruling in New Jersey very soon as the Supreme Court of the State of New Jersey just heard oral argument on October 14, 2015 in Templo Fuente De Vida Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Children's National Medical Center, 121 A.3d 59, 66 (D.C. 2015) (adopting Restatement §500 “high degree of risk of harm” standard).Florida:  Dyals v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Cutter Laboratories, 53 F.3d 1184, 1192-93 (11th Cir. 1995) (applying Florida law); Odom v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
The Florida Bar, five Justices upheld the state’s ban on personal solicitations of campaign funds by candidates for judicial office. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm
 According to Techdirt (here), Judge William Martini dismissed the suit, saying the Florida business had "minimum contacts" with state residents aside from online sales of branded merchandise. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
United States, SCOTUS Blog (Nov. 14, 2014), http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/yates-v-united-states/. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
Wright, 98 Minn. 477, 478-79, 108 N.W. 865 (1906) (each dog owner is liable separately for the damages done by his animal); Anderson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 10:28 am
 He says:"The majority repeatedly states that Avila and two fellow officers, Romney and Anderson, were disciplined only after they testified in the Maciel litigation. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:49 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the appeals court reversed the lower court’s entry of judgment in favor of the county based on its finding that there was insufficient evidence to prove that the county had engaged in unlawful retaliation when it required the firefighters to take a fitness-for-duty (FFD) exam after they filed discrimination charges against it (Booth v Pasco County, Florida, July 3, 2014, Anderson, R). [read post]