Search for: "State of Michigan, et al v. United States Army Corps of E, et al" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2015, 8:54 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Coalition for Responsible Regulation, et al., v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:02 am
It originates from the rights of privacy afforded under the United States Constitution, but surprisingly, there is no federal right per se. [3]  [4] Rather, forty states recognize either a statutory or common law right of publicity, and fourteen extend its reach beyond a person’s death. [5] As a result, California’s right of publicity laws are different from New York, etc., which means that a lawsuit’s outcome is highly dependent on the… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
It originates from the rights of privacy afforded under the United States Constitution, but surprisingly, there is no federal right per se. [3]  [4] Rather, forty states recognize either a statutory or common law right of publicity, and fourteen extend its reach beyond a person’s death. [5] As a result, California’s right of publicity laws are different from New York, etc., which means that a lawsuit’s outcome is highly dependent on the… [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 2:21 pm by WIMS
The petition for panel rehearing by Appellees' Maryland Square Shopping Center, LLC, et al is granted. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
Jonathan Samet, et al., Institute of Medicine, Asbestos: Selected Health Effects (2006). [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
And the United States Supreme Court, the Michigan Supreme Court, this Court, and courts of other states have treated the right as extending beyond firearms. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm by WIMS
Army Corps of Engineers and the City of Chicago, et al. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor) &nbsp; Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP) &nbsp; United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]