Search for: "State of Mississippi v. AU Optronics Corp., et al" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Courts Find Removal Is Not Permitted Under CAFA Where Plaintiff Did Not Plead A Class Action Under Rule 23 Or Comparable State Rule
24 Apr 2014, 5:58 am
AU Optronics Corp., 134 S.Ct. 736 (2014) to create a class action where the State did not plead one. [read post]
Class Action Blog - http://www.cfjblaw.com/classactionblog/blog.aspx
Mass Action Should Contain 100 Or More Actual Named Plaintiffs; Not Just 100 Or More Named Or Unnamed Real Parties In Interest
11 Sep 2017, 3:00 am by cafalawblog@mcglinchey.com (McGlinchey Stafford PLLC)
AU Optronics Corp., 134 S. [read post]
Class Action Fairness Act Blog - http://www.cafalawblog.com/
2014 Outlook For Class Actions in the Supreme Court
6 Feb 2014, 8:22 am
AU Optronics Corp. [read post]
Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog - http://www.chicagobusinesslitigationlawyerblog.com/
New Class Action Cases on the Supreme Court's Horizon
5 Jan 2014, 9:19 am
AU Optronics Corp. [read post]
Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog - http://www.chicagobusinesslitigationlawyerblog.com/
Mere Suggestions Or Predictions To Join Coordinated Proceeding Are Insufficient To Trigger CAFA’s Mass Action Jurisdiction
10 Nov 2017, 3:00 am by cafalawblog@mcglinchey.com (McGlinchey Stafford PLLC)
Alanis, et al. v. [read post]
Class Action Fairness Act Blog - http://www.cafalawblog.com/
Wednesday round-up
29 May 2013, 7:51 am by Allison Trzop
AU Optronics Corp., in which the Court will clarify the authority of state governments to sue in state courts to protect their residents from alleged price fixing; Kent Scheidegger also covers the Rosemond grant at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/