Search for: "State of NY v. General Elec. Co." Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Co., 88 NY2d 869, and [2] that the violation must be of the kind that "creates a substantial and specific danger to the public health or safety," citing Remba v Federation Empl. [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:43 am
Generally, a party seeking to pierce the corporate veil must show: (1) complete domination and control of the subsidiary by the parent with respect to the transaction at issue; and (2) that such domination was used to commit a fraud or wrong against the plaintiff that resulted in the plaintiff's injury (see Matter of Morris v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin. , 82 NY2d 135, 141 [1993]; Do Gooder Prods., Inc. v American Jewish Theatre, Inc., 66 AD3d… [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(NY St Cts Elec Filing System [NYSCEF] Doc No. 149, second amended verified complaint, ¶ 2). [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am by Keith Szeliga and Daniel Alvarado
*     *     * [A]ny expense which is so necessary that absent its incurrence a contractor could not continue in business would automatically be held to benefit or bear an equitable relationship to Government contracts. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Article Four further stated as follows:As an extremely loving and devoted parent, I found that the love, care and concern which I lavished on my daughter was not acknowledged or returned in any way by my daughter. [read post]