Search for: "State of NY v. Sullivan" Results 1 - 20 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2008, 4:09 am
Samuel Cosentino, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 4:09 am
Samuel Cosentino, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 1:12 pm
Sullivan & Cromwell and Sullivan & Cromwell v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
S170577: I attended the oral argument today at the California Supreme Court for Sullivan v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:56 pm
Sullivan & Cromwell and Sullivan & Cromwell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 11:29 am
The New York Law Journal reports this morning (March 15) that NY State Supreme Court Justice Bernard Fried has ordered that some lawyers who were present at the "secret" settlement meeting on January 31 submit to depositions to settle a hotly disputed point: whether a Sullivan & Cromwell partner who was present at the meeting, Gandolfo V. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 9:47 pm by Patricia Salkin
Sullivan Farms IV, LLC v Village of Wurstboro, 2015 WL 8373781 (NYAD 3 Dept. 12/10/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Site Plan Review, Subdivision Regulation [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:50 pm
As reported in today's NY Times (here), the certiorari petition in Sullivan v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:22 pm by Patricia Salkin
Bloomingburg Jewish Education Center v Village of Bloomingburg, 2015 WL 3604300 (SDNY 6/9/2015) The opinion and order can be accessed at: http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=1202729033706/Bloomingburg-Jewish-Education-Center-et-al-Plaintiffs-v-Village-of-Bloomingburg-New-York-et-al-Defendants-14cv7250-KBF Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, RLUIPA Tagged: hasidism and zoning, mikva and zoning, zoning discrimination [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:58 pm by Heidi Meinzer
The statute at the time, Virginia Code Section 3.1-796.122 [currently Code Section 3.2-6570], stated that “[a]ny person who . . . [read post]
10 May 2007, 6:38 pm
Supp. 86 (SDNY), in which Judge Mottley ruled that the Yankees ARE a state actor, relying on the Supreme Court's 1961 opinion in Burton v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 4:45 am
Financial investment data concerning public official's spouse subject to disclosure pursuant to the Freedom of Information LawMatter of Humane Socy. of United States v Fanslau, 2008 NY Slip Op 06681, Decided on August 28, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, the Court of Appeals said that there is a presumption that all government and agency records are open for public inspection unless the… [read post]