Search for: "State of Nebraska v. EPA"
Results 1 - 20
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2016, 9:02 am
<> State of Nebraska v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:19 am
Assuming that the northeastern states support the Clean Power Plan, it sets up a sort of "Blue v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:16 am
In Dow Chemical Company v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:07 am
EPA - 4/15/16. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:23 am
A week or so later nine states — West Virginia, Wyoming, South Carolina, Ohio, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Alaska, Alabama, and Kentucky —petitioned to join the Murray Energy suit. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 7:01 am
" Katz v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:19 am
Assuming that the northeastern states support the Clean Power Plan, it sets up a sort of "Blue v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 6:43 am
As stated in the Federal Register notice, EPA will consider the written comments with the same weight as any oral comments presented at the public hearing. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:31 pm
EPA and Georgia v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:23 am
A week or so later nine states — West Virginia, Wyoming, South Carolina, Ohio, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Alaska, Alabama, and Kentucky —petitioned to join the Murray Energy suit. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:06 am
EPA. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
The 11 other states involved, in addition to Texas, are Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina and South Dakota. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
In Nebraska, he government argued that the major question doctrine rule from West Virginia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:17 am
Yesterday, we posted most of the amici briefs in Sackett v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 10:51 am
State of Nebraska and Department of Education v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Moreover, unfolding decisions by Ohio and Nebraska in the crafting and enforcement of their rules could easily “change the behavior of voters, parties and States across the country” in an evolving way.To be sure, each of the episodes discussed above could arguably be constitutionally distinguished from the Section 3 question at issue in Trump v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 12:39 pm
District Court for the District of North Dakota, in State of Ohio, et al., v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 11:54 am
(David Zalubowski/AP) Ilya, Jonathan, Randy and I are skeptical about the Nebraska & Oklahoma v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:05 pm
The legislative activity stems from the Supreme Court ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
