Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 3,499
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2012, 11:41 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
In an opinion out of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on March 23, 2012, the court concluded that is not the case under the New Jersey statute §2A:15-97. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:39 pm by Mike Gottlieb
United States, which today resolved a decade-old controversy regarding the constitutional distinction between two kinds of sentences: mandatory minimums and statutory maximums. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Jon Gelman
A New Jersey judge ruled on Friday that the state must allow same-sex couples to marry, saying that not doing so deprives them of rights that were guaranteed by the United States Supreme Court in June. [read post]
6 May 2009, 2:58 am
District Court for the District of New Jersey issued significant prison sentences and a stiff criminal fine in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 10:06 am by Sean Kirby
On February 11, 2015, the Supreme Court of New Jersey expressly adopted the test created by the United States Supreme Court in Faragher v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 11:32 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
State of New Jersey, the New Jersey Supreme Court provided employers a new defense to sexual harassment claims under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”). [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 10:32 am by John Stigi
  MBUSA, which is a Delaware limited liability company that operates in New Jersey, is Daimler’s exclusive importer and distributer of cars in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:19 am by John H. Klock
The case has some parallels to a case pending in the New Jersey State court captioned the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:40 am by DMLP Staff
Yesterday the Digital Media Law Project, with help from the Cyberlaw Clinic, filed an amicus brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]