Search for: "State of New York et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2025, 6:00 am
Thus, a removal application that does not include the specific notice required by 8 NYCRR 277.1 (b) is fatally defective and must be denied (Application of Johnson, et al., 56 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,055; Appeal of White and Carmand, 56 id., Decision No. 16,994; Appeal of Kelly, 45 id. [read post]
14 May 2025, 6:00 am
Thus, a removal application that does not include the specific notice required by 8 NYCRR 277.1 (b) is fatally defective and must be denied (Application of Johnson, et al., 56 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,055; Appeal of White and Carmand, 56 id., Decision No. 16,994; Appeal of Kelly, 45 id. [read post]
9 May 2025, 6:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180; see Matter of Ciganik v New York City Off. of Admin. [read post]
9 May 2025, 6:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180; see Matter of Ciganik v New York City Off. of Admin. [read post]
9 May 2025, 1:19 am
City of New York, 559 U. [read post]
8 May 2025, 6:00 am
Parker, New York (Sandra D. [read post]
8 May 2025, 6:00 am
Parker, New York (Sandra D. [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm
Langton v Sussman & Watkins2025 NY Slip Op 02765Decided on May 7, 2025Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided on May 7, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm
Langton v Sussman & Watkins2025 NY Slip Op 02765Decided on May 7, 2025Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided on May 7, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm
The New York BitLicense, for example, is required for all “activities involving New York or a New York Resident” (23 CRR-NY I 200.2(q)). [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 5:50 am
The New York Times Company, et. al v. [read post]
27 Apr 2025, 7:58 pm
In the case of People of the State of New York v. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 11:41 am
Republished by Blog Post PromoterA new lawsuit commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York—John Johnson (not an alias) et ano. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 10:48 am
The suit, Doe 1 et. al. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2025, 9:01 pm
General Electric Company, et al., No. 1:17-cv-08457-JMF. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 3:26 pm
CVS, and he played significant roles in cases including the New York et al. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 2:00 am
NPR and The New York Times covered the story. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 3:19 pm
New York State Gaming Commission, et al. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 7:48 am
Ballard Spahr LLP et al., case number 1:25-cv-02885, in the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2025, 5:23 pm
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al v. [read post]