Search for: "State v Bishop" Results 1 - 20 of 946
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
That is a lesson from John Courtney Murray.Murray died in 1967, before Pope Paul VI issued his famous letter against contraception and the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am by David Pocklington
A late complication has arisen unfortunately concerning a Tudor painted roof/ceiling, which, although it will not affect the grant of the faculty may impact on the precise timing of the commencement of works which is dealt with in the Conditions”, The petition sought permission: (i) to install lavatories in the north transept in an area near to the organ, (ii) to enclose the chapel space in the eastern bay of the north transept to create a sound-proof room which can be heated… [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
Zoe Ingenhaag, Lexology: Gender critical beliefs in the workplace: on Phoenix v The Open University, Meade v Westminster City Council and Anor and Ali v Reason & Nott. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:57 pm by NARF
(Indian Civil Rights Act; Tribal Court) United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am by David Pocklington
Given his decision to refuse a faculty to remove all of the pews, the Chancellor stated that the Petitioners may wish to re-think their proposals in respect of the heating. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:15 am by Meredith Ervine
Our readers know that Delaware forum selection clauses have been enforced by courts in many states since Delaware Chancery’s 2013 decision in Boilermakers v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
He will be consecrated bishop on May 11 and will adopt the title of Bishop of Bardsey, as well as Assistant Bishop of Bangor. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 9:42 am by Frank Cranmer
It was also the week in which it was alleged by the media that Ms Vennells had been shortlisted for Bishop of London. [read post]
Florida is only one of many states with upcoming or recently voted upon ballot initiatives surrounding the issue of abortion since the Supreme Court released its ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:11 am by David Pocklington
 It is clear that the Bishops do not wish to expose homosexual persons to violence. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am by Frank Cranmer
Simon Hoare, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (and, we learned, the Government’s Minister for Faith), replied. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
State-court decisions enjoining contested votes include the following: Max v ALP, Inc., 206 AD3d 495 [1st Dept 2022] [“Order . . . which granted defendants’ motion for a preliminary injunction to the extent of enjoining . . . from commencing a shareholders’ meeting for the purpose of restoring plaintiff as President and CEO of defendant ALP, Inc.. . . unanimously affirmed”]; and ANO, Inc. v Goldberg, 167 AD3d 731 [2d Dept 2018] [“Yimini… [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am by Frank Cranmer
” The response to a follow-up question on 8 December from the Bishop of Worcester was inconsequential. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:40 am by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Monday in one of the highest-profile bankruptcies in recent memory: Harrington v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am by Frank Cranmer
Without a doubt, he states, the canons provide for how a bishop is appointed and for how disputes relating to the election of bishops are resolved: “Courts cannot appoint a bishop for the Church. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am by David Pocklington
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]