Search for: "State v. Abbott"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,773
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2024, 9:39 am
’ Purcell v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
Greg Abbott defended the use of the wire fencing, writing on X (then known as Twitter) that “Texas has the sovereign authority to defend our borders” and insisting that the state would “continue to deploy every strategy to protect Texans and Americans — and the migrants risking their lives. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
In support of the lawsuit, the ACLU referred the court to the 2012 case of Arizona v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:26 am
A similar law was passed in Arizona in 2010 before being struck down in Arizona v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:42 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In Durkin v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 3:16 pm
Abbott, decided today by Judge Robert Pitman (W.D. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm
↑ Thaler v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 8:23 am
USA v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:29 am
(NA) Yesterday, the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled against Texas in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Abbott, involving a challenge to the use of nonmutual offensive collateral estoppel to hold that issues resolved in bellwether tort trials bind the defendant in later cases. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:05 am
At issue in the case was the removal of FFRF's "Bill of Right Nativity Exhibit" from the Texas state capitol. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 11:24 am
” Abbott v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
A recent Washington Post column stated—misleadingly, if not just plain wrongly—that Google spent billions “to hide this setting from you. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 2:00 am
The Claremont Canyon Conservancy v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:36 am
And in Erlinger v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm
United States, Thomas v. [read post]
