Search for: "State v. Adams" Results 21 - 40 of 5,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2008, 5:36 am
Unfortunately, this narrative of "Adams, the Non-Partisan," caused the show to omit what was, indirectly, his long-lasting legacy: The appointment of John Marshall (prominently featured as Adams's second Secretary of State) as Chief Justice and, as his term ended, the appointment of the "Midnight Judges," which together led to Marbury v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am by Steve Hall
The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 1:10 pm by Daily Record Staff
Administrative law — Employment termination — Substantial evidence On December 15, 2015, the Maryland State Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (hereinafter “the Department”), issued a Notice of Termination to Timberlie Adams, R.N. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 9:54 am
The State of California Department of Health Services decided that they did not especially want Avril Adams to be employed in that position, she sued, lost at trial, filed another suit, got it dismissed, filed an appeal, and lost again. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:36 am by Immigration Prof
Adam Liptak writes of the possibility that Chief Justice John Roberts might side with the Obama administration in United State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 11:54 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Adam Lamparello (Indiana Tech - Law School) has posted Riley v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:25 am by tracey
Regina (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice (JUSTICE and another intervening); In re MacDermott’s and McCartney’s Applications for Judicial Review (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 18; [2011] WLR (D) 155 “A miscarriage of justice, within the meaning of section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, occurred where a new fact so undermined the evidence against the defendant that no conviction could possibly be based upon it. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:11 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Dodge (state court tort suit) 8-13-19-first-amended-complaint.pdf Doucette v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by John McFarland
The Texas Supreme Court denied the landowners’ motion for rehearing last Friday in Murphy v. [read post]