Search for: "State v. Addington" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
If a person is a danger to himself, then he might be subject to civil commitment, under Addington v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
A small handful of cases involving judicial review have ensured the CICB continued to achieve the goals stated in the Act in a reasonable manner. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In Addington v Texas, the United States Supreme Court held that a civil commitment proceeding can in no sense be equated with a criminal proceeding. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In 1979, the United States Supreme Court in Addington v Texas held that constitutional due process required the government to prove two statutory preconditions by clear and convincing evidence before a court could commit an individual to a mental institution: (1) that the person sought to be committed is mentally ill; and (2) that such person requires hospitalization for his own welfare and protection of others. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 3:00 pm
It is the court’s view that it is significant that the Supreme Court in Addington recognized that states could choose to impose a higher standard of proof but that a higher standard was not constitutionally required. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:30 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Heritage’s David Addington has some concerns with CISPA. [read post]