Search for: "State v. Advertiser Co., Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 1,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
In In re Tobacco Cases II, 41 Cal.4th 1257 (2007), for example, the California Supreme Court held that the FCLAA preempted a UCL claim to the extent that it "seeks to impose on defendant tobacco companies a duty not to advertise in a way that could encourage minors to smoke," citing Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:53 pm by admin
In late 2010, the Tribunal imposed AMPs of $20,000 and $10,000 against parties in Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As stated in Luxul Technology Inc. v. [read post]