Search for: "State v. Agee"
Results 1 - 20
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
The NAB v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concluded today in Peltier v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 10:07 am
Judges Quattlebaum, Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Agee, and Rushing dissented. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 2:51 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 5:01 am
Curious, I dug up the appellate opinion, U.S. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm
On this episode, plaintiffs from the landmark case of Monroe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm
Judge Agee dissented and would have affirmed the district court’s ruling. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
For example, in the 2015 case Harris v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:08 am
Hudson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 12:15 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 11:26 am
Steven Agee, Paul Victor Niemeyer and Julius Ness Richardson, should view the animus of the travel ban differently than the Supreme Court found in remanding this case and in Trump v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Reed v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 12:07 pm
In Manning v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 4:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 8:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 3:49 pm
See State of Oregon v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:37 pm
Agee, 622 So. 2d 473, 475 (Fla. 1993), in which the court had ruled the state could not enter a nol pros and then refile charges outside the “speedy trial” period, and Genden v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 2:01 pm
Department of State; Assistant Secretary of State, Educational and Cultural Affairs. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
Agee also asserted First Amendment interests, relying on Supreme Court precedents (such as Kent v. [read post]
