Search for: "State v. Agee"
Results 21 - 40
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2019, 3:49 pm
See State of Oregon v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:37 pm
Agee, 622 So. 2d 473, 475 (Fla. 1993), in which the court had ruled the state could not enter a nol pros and then refile charges outside the “speedy trial” period, and Genden v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 2:01 pm
Department of State; Assistant Secretary of State, Educational and Cultural Affairs. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
Agee also asserted First Amendment interests, relying on Supreme Court precedents (such as Kent v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:15 am
Yesterday in American Humanist Association v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:00 am
Knauff v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:40 am
” In Trump v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:24 pm
Agee. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
In Haig v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
” The government also focuses on the three dissents, highlighting Judge Agee’s examination of justiciability, Judge Niemeyer’s determination that the majority’s Establishment Clause analysis “plainly violates” Kleindienst v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
Part V will analyze the dissents of Judges Shedd and Agee and discuss the possible paths ahead following the Solicitor General’s appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm
Part V will analyze the dissents of Judges Shedd and Agee and discuss what happens as this case is appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
’” All these opinions rely heavily on McCreary County v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am
Part IV will analyze the three dissents from Judges Niemeyer, Shedd, and Agee, which were aimed at highlighting for the Supreme Court how their colleagues selectively cited the record and deviated from precedent. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:30 am
Specifically, citing McCreary County v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
Part IV will analyze the three dissents from Judges Niemeyer, Shedd, and Agee, which were aimed at highlighting for the Supreme Court how their colleagues selectively cited the record and deviated from precedent. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am
As Fourth Circuit judges Niemeyer, Shedd, and Agee noted in dissent, the majority’s approach is “unworkable and inappropriate. [read post]
