Search for: "State v. Aiken"
Results 21 - 40
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2009, 3:21 pm
Association of Unit Owners of Nestani, a Grecian Villa v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:54 pm
From today's decision by Judge Ann Aiken (D. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Juliana v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 7:20 pm
Seventeen state attorneys general are seeking to intervene in Juliana v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:19 am
Supreme Court's decision today in Ashcroft v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:09 pm
The Court has, however, reviewed the record and takes particular note of the recent orders issued by the United States Supreme Court on July 30, 2018, and November 2, 2018, as well as the extraordinary Order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 7:06 am
To paraphrase only slightly Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 10:28 am
Gourley and Aiken v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:27 am
(…) Aikens J. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:58 am
The contract expressly stated that the relationship between the parties was that of client and independent contractor. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 2:45 pm
United States,504 F. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
Lord Justice Aiken, delivering the unanimous verdict of the Court, which included Lord Justice Longmore who delivered the leading judgment in AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551, dismissed the appeal. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 11:25 am
The plaintiffs in Juliana v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 2:12 pm
This reasoning along with the similar very recent South Carolina Supreme Court ruling in Aiken v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 3:12 pm
This reasoning along with the similar very recent South Carolina Supreme Court ruling in Aiken v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 12:08 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 6:48 am
See Aikens v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 8:39 am
Aikens et al. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
Aikens LJ and Simon J, [2014] EWHC 4167 (Admin) described Pham as “a British resident” and dismissed his appeal; the court held at para 91 that in its “view whether the appellant is a British citizen or not makes no difference to his relevant article 6 rights. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
The Court of Appeal (Aikens, Mummery and Elias LJJ) upheld this argument in February 2010. [read post]
