Search for: "State v. Aiken"
Results 61 - 80
of 118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2012, 4:43 pm
Flir v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
”1 Aside from the granular problems stated above, and recognizing that the proposed amendments would in fact add to the problem astutely noted in the quote above by Lawrence Lessig, there is a global, more systemic conflict at issue within the realm of copyright enforcement litigation deserving mention. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:57 pm
(See Roach v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:31 am
Aiken, 422 U.S. 151, 156 (1975). [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:56 am
Aiken, 422 U.S. 151, 156 (1975). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
(A California case, Aikens v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:25 am
edited by Richard Aikens, Kenneth Richardson. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:23 pm
Sally Aiken or Dr. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:49 am
Judge Aiken rejected these arguments. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:46 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) The Queen on the application of Guardian News and Media Limited -v- City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court heard 11 October 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Jackson and… [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:28 pm
In Hill v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:58 am
The contract expressly stated that the relationship between the parties was that of client and independent contractor. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
Private practice and the state bench followed. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
The Court of Appeal (Aikens, Mummery and Elias LJJ) upheld this argument in February 2010. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:24 pm
See Jackson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:45 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
Lord Justice Aiken, delivering the unanimous verdict of the Court, which included Lord Justice Longmore who delivered the leading judgment in AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551, dismissed the appeal. [read post]
30 May 2011, 10:15 am
“ Justice Alito, in his majority opinion in Kentucky v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:54 am
All three judgments (Thorpe LJ, Aikens LJ and Black LJ) resist firmly the suggestion either that the ECHR in Neulinger had jurisdiction to oversee individual states’ applications of the Hague Convention, or that the decision in Neulinger requires a relaxing of the restrictive approach to Article 13(b) defences. [read post]
14 May 2011, 7:24 am
Or if this were V-J day and a sailor’s kiss said it all. [read post]
