Search for: "State v. Alabama Power Co."
Results 181 - 200
of 296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Alabama Power Co., 483 F.3d 1184 (11th Cir. 2007), a recent Eleventh Circuit case in which the Court “reiterated that the removing party bears this burden [of proving federal jurisdiction exists] even in the context of CAFA, despite legislative history to the contrary. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
Fox’s co-host Calvin Robinson was also fired after voicing support for the actor. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:43 am
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit held in King Drug Co. of Florence v. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 7:43 am
(Philip Morris v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 1:16 am
By 1962, most states had abandoned poll taxes, but they remained in effect in five: Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Virginia. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 1:05 pm
Where as most potential Supreme Court nominees are circumspect about their views of Roe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:58 am
The Court found this inapplicable as state power has been applied through statute. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am
In Steel Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
Hewlett-Packard Co., 15-1130, and Cooper v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SAN State of MI v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
JANUARY SITTING: Alabama v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am
Tway Co. v High Tech Performance Trailers, LLC. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
Alabama, 10-9646, and Jackson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:56 am
In Sherbert v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
This Congress shall have plenary power. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
My friend and case-book co-editor Akhil Reed Amar believes that it is “nonsensical” to argue that there was the slightest merit to the Southern argument for secession as presented in 1860-61. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:10 pm
Accordingly, the 11th Circuit held that it did not have the power to hear her appeal. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
