Search for: "State v. Alabama Power Co." Results 201 - 220 of 300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2012, 3:04 am by SHG
” This conclusion was reaffirmed by the Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-5614, in which the Fourth Circuit took the same view as the Fifth Circuit on the co-tenant consent question. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:36 am by Bexis
  Because of this independent basis for jurisdiction, there was no need for opt-out rights as otherwise would be the case under Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:41 pm by Lawrence Solum
Supreme Court’s de facto cap that it placed on punitive damages in maritime cases in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 7:42 am by Paul Horwitz
 (See also the CLS case, and the famous Mozert v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
These types of profiles are very commercially powerful. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Co., 282 N.W.2d 639, 661 (Iowa 1979); Wolder v.. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 1:45 am
On October 14, 2011 the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released its opinion in Lewis v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
  Cory Maples is on death row in Alabama for killing two men. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
Alabama (relisted after the 9/26 and 10/7 Conferences) Docket:  10-9646 Issue(s):  Whether imposing a sentence of life without possibility of parole on an offender who was fourteen at the time he committed capital murder constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
Alabama (relisted after the 9/26 Conference) Docket:  10-9646 Issue(s):  Whether imposing a sentence of life without possibility of parole on an offender who was 14 at the time he committed capital murder constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
Alabama, 10-9646, and Jackson v. [read post]