Search for: "State v. Alabama Power Co." Results 241 - 260 of 292
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2010, 11:42 am
Alabama Power Co., 483 F.3d 1184 (11th Cir. 2007) prohibited Kolter from supporting its removal notice with documents that had not been received from the plaintiffs. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:39 am by Steve Vladeck
One may well suspect that Justice Alito does not hold his predecessor's views on this issue (or, at least, her latest views as manifested in Katz), but, in four Terms, the issue has yet to squarely arise (assuming one doesn't count Chief Justice Roberts's dissent earlier this month in Alabama v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:52 am by gheriot
Opportunity Scholarship Program went down in flames,  Secretary of Education Arne Duncan stood on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am by Matt Sundquist
”  And in 1982, in Globe Newspaper Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
Click Here Settlement Agreement for Recovery of Past Response Costs Colorado Bumper Exchange Site, Pueblo, Pueblo County, CO. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:58 pm by David Kopel
Florida Board of Regents, and Alabama v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
Alabama Power Co., 483 F.3d 1184 (11th Cir. 1007), the court could only consider evidence of the amount in controversy that comes exclusively from the plaintiffs. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
------- Title: NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm by smtaber
The court threw new obstacles Friday in front of the Sevier Power Co. by requiring a substantial updating of its air-pollution permit for a 270-megawatt, $600 million electric generator in Sigurd. [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:00 pm
But even on the bench, Ginsburg has embraced gender as a source of diversity, and her opinions have challenged male judges for embracing gender-based stereotypes.In United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
Alabama Power Co., 483 F.3d 1184, 1211-12 (11th Cir. 2007) (stating “in assessing the propriety of removal [under section 1446(b)], the court considers the document received by the defendant from the plaintiff[.] [read post]