Search for: "State v. Alabama Power Co." Results 21 - 40 of 278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2011, 1:45 am
On October 14, 2011 the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released its opinion in Lewis v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
Alabama Power Co., 483 F.3d 1184, 1211-12 (11th Cir. 2007) (stating “in assessing the propriety of removal [under section 1446(b)], the court considers the document received by the defendant from the plaintiff[.] [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 8:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
” Urging en banc rehearing, the state argued that the Circuit Court decision conflicts directly with a Supreme Court ruling in 1987 — International Paper Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:47 pm
Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1846) (running a company town is a public function) with Jackson v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by John C. Coffee, Jr.
Two examples within the last year, both striking down agency actions, stand out: In Alabama Ass’n of Realtors v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In a concurrence in the order denying Alabama’s requested relief in Dunn v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 3:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Both the aforesaid contentions were considered by this Criminal Court in People v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
But most states have a statute on the books, like Alabama’s, which explicitly bars slayers from inheriting. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  Unfortunately it appears that, instead of (or perhaps in addition to, given the recent election results) the Ten Commandments, there’s another commandment that the Alabama Supreme Court is following:  Thou Shalt (if you’re an Alabamian) Recover From An Out-Of-State Drug Company.While the Alabama Supreme Court certainly has the power to abandon the notion of manufacturer liability for defects in its products (unlike a federal court sitting… [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:39 am by Steve Vladeck
One may well suspect that Justice Alito does not hold his predecessor's views on this issue (or, at least, her latest views as manifested in Katz), but, in four Terms, the issue has yet to squarely arise (assuming one doesn't count Chief Justice Roberts's dissent earlier this month in Alabama v. [read post]