Search for: "State v. Alabama Power Co."
Results 161 - 180
of 269
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2014, 11:38 am
The McCutcheon v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:26 am
McKoon, Jr., as co-counsel. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Some state’s statutes exempt conduct in "compliance" with relevant governmental oversight, which we’re taking to mean "FDA," regulations (Alabama, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, Oregon). [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Visciotti and its progeny, by finding a state court’s application of Beck v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Alabama ex. rel. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:02 am
On Appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Steele v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:42 am
The decision came in the case of Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
As to them, however, we adhere to our general rule that we don’t do the other side’s research for them.AlabamaThe Alabama Supreme Court held, in E.R. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 7:57 am
The Court returns to that topic the first week of the term when it hears arguments in No. 12-929, Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Steel Mining Co., LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm
In American Express Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Alabama). [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
During the oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
Unfortunately it appears that, instead of (or perhaps in addition to, given the recent election results) the Ten Commandments, there’s another commandment that the Alabama Supreme Court is following: Thou Shalt (if you’re an Alabamian) Recover From An Out-Of-State Drug Company.While the Alabama Supreme Court certainly has the power to abandon the notion of manufacturer liability for defects in its products (unlike a federal court sitting… [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 3:04 am
” This conclusion was reaffirmed by the Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
United States, 12-5614, in which the Fourth Circuit took the same view as the Fifth Circuit on the co-tenant consent question. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:49 am
" Mills v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:36 am
Because of this independent basis for jurisdiction, there was no need for opt-out rights as otherwise would be the case under Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
United States (relisted [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:41 pm
Supreme Court’s de facto cap that it placed on punitive damages in maritime cases in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
