Search for: "State v. Alexander"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2013, 6:15 am
The abstract: Cobell v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:23 pm
Alexander, 303 F.3d 1059, 1067 (9th Cir.2002). [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
Other coverage comes from Alexander Gray and Michael Levy for Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 9:34 am
Clearly, the government argued, Butina was in contact with Russian intelligence officials during her time in the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 4:28 pm
Previous articles in relation to the cases of PJS v NGN and ABC have highlighted the potential pitfalls of anonymous injunctions, in particular their tendency to get the press excited. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:32 am
United States and NFIB v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:13 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s recent ruling in CBX Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Secretary of State of Georgia (Brennan Center). [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 7:11 pm
The case is Alexander Prout v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 4:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
A 1781 Pennsylvania state court case against the state of Virginia, Nathan v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 4:08 pm
Sanders v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:35 am
State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:19 am
Alexander Bickel was a profoundly complicated and nuanced man. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 11:16 am
Couple that with the small damage amount, Alexander’s stated goal of opening up this licensing opportunity for tattoo artists is unlikely to come to fruition just yet. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 9:32 am
This decision comes on the heels of a similar Sixth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:23 pm
In Pennsylvania v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 4:30 am
State governments have defended such taxes against First Amendment attack on the theory that (1) such taxes combat negative secondary effects and (under Renton v. [read post]
