Search for: "State v. Alexander" Results 101 - 120 of 2,344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Case date: 05 December 2023 Case number: No. 22-1006 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:58 pm by Steven Calabresi
 Even Alexander Hamilton, himself, said in his brief for the United States in Hylton v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm by Jim Lindgren
Second, Alexander Hamilton himself said in his brief for the United States in Hylton v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am by Beatrice Yahia
Alexander Cornwell reports for Reuters. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973) Carlson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:58 am by Beatrice Yahia
Frank Thorp V and Megan Lebowitz report for NBC News. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 6:41 am by Christopher J. Walker
by Benton Bodamer (Ohio State Drug Policy Enforcement Center Report, 2023) Amicus Brief in SEC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
Musk has threatened to sue Media Matters, who reported the antisemitic content they found on X and have stated that they would defend any litigation. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm by Jim Lindgren
It is true that Alexander Hamilton and one Supreme Court Justice, Samuel Chase in Hylton v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
Master Bell stated that he “thought long and hard about whether or not to strike out Ms O’Neill’s action in the light of this jurisprudence and came close to doing so” [46]. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]