Search for: "State v. Alexander" Results 121 - 140 of 2,153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2009, 6:40 pm
The Court stated that a claimant may recover for lost profit if the loss is reasonably foreseeable and can be proven with reasonable certainty. [read post]
8 May 2022, 6:52 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Jenna Russo, The Protection of Civilians and the Primacy of Politics: Complementarities and Friction in South Sudan Lenneke Sprik, Jennifer Giblin, & Alexander Gilder, The Role of UN Peace Operations in Security Sector Reform and the Relationship with the Protection of Civilians Craig Lang, Building the Rule of Law in Post-Conflict States: International v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 9:35 am
Jolene Lin, The First Successful Climate Negligence Case: A Comment on Urgenda Foundation v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 8:59 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Indeed, he would resign on August 9, just over two weeks after United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm by Kent Scheidegger
A few post-settlement developments in the California lethal injection suit, Winchell & Alexander v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 8:11 am
States have put up fences and adopted policies to deny, deter, and detain asylum seekers. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 10:00 am by Scott Hervey
A jury in the District Court for the Southern District of Illinois in the case of Alexander v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 7:36 am
Alexander James Dallas (1759-1817), Reports of Cases Ruled and Adjudged in the Several Courts of the United States, and of Pennsylvania, Held at the Seat of the Federal Government, vol. 2 (Philadelphia, 1798). [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 6:45 am by scanner1
Sandrock DA 17-0726 2018 MT 269 Civil – Other State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am by Richard A. Epstein
  From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Daniel Alexander QC stated in his judgment that ‘the object of this court is, however, not only to decide cases more efficiently and cheaply but also to help SMEs resolve disputes without the need for a trial. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:51 am
Filed: November 6, 2009Opinion by Judge Alexander Williams, Jr.Held: Plaintiffs' speculation regarding an anticipated assignment of their franchise contracts does not give rise to a cause of action for violations of the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (the "PMPA") 58 U.S.C. [read post]