Search for: "State v. Alexander" Results 121 - 140 of 2,314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm by Sri Medicherla
Uriel-Charles discussed the 1960 Supreme Court case Gomillion v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On 16 June 2023, Andrew Baker J quashed a prisoner governor’s decision to stop a man jailed for murder from talking to a journalist for a podcast about his appeal against conviction, R (Alexander) v Secretary of State for Justice [2023] EWHC 1407 (Admin). [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
The Cleveland State Law Review has published "Alexander Hamilton and Administrative Law: How America's First Great Public Administrator Informs and Challenges Our Understanding of Contemporary Administrative Law," by Rodger D. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
At the very beginning of it all, in 1790, there was Virginia’s furious ‘memorial’ claiming the unconstitutionality of the Funding Act, which prompted Alexander Hamilton’s tremulous response: ‘This is the first symptom of a spirit which must either be killed or will kill the constitution of the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Omotoyosi Adisa on Nigeria's first lawyer, Christopher Alexander Sapara Williams (RNN). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The book points out that neither the Federalist nor other early commentaries used the word “interposition” and that the term did not even surface in state protests against Chisholm v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
”[8] In Federalist 71, Alexander Hamilton argued that a key role of the Executive Branch is to make decisions carefully under pressure: to undertake “cool and sedate reflection. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am by Steve Bainbridge
”); id. at *13 n.16 (“[T]he Supreme Court’s subsequent decisions have called into question Borak’s dicta that a shareholder has a right to bring a derivative § 14(a) action”). [5] See Alexander v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by Robert Brammer
That provision was also challenged in Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. [read post]