Search for: "State v. Alford"
Results 21 - 40
of 324
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2022, 4:00 am
Alford v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 1:19 pm
The post RUDY AGUILAR GARCIA v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 8:10 pm
In another recent decision in Ontario, Ontario v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 8:52 am
State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 11:03 am
Wheeler and United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 6:34 am
The post MICHAEL PATRICK v. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 6:36 am
The post KENNETH GROVES v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 10:04 am
Motors Corp., 486 N.W.2d 223, 225 (Neb. 1992) (citing Alford v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:13 pm
Alford Pleas Another plea in federal court is technically a guilty plea, but it has come to be known as an “Alford Plea” based upon the Supreme Court case of North Carolina v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm
The Society of Editors had a news “Society appoints Dawn Alford as new Executive Director. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 7:00 am
Criminal procedure — Sentence modification — COVID-19 In 2010, Elliott Schneider, appellant, entered an Alford plea to conspiracy to commit first-degree murder and was sentenced to life, with all but thirty years suspended. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
The juvenile then entered an Alford admission of responsibility and preserved his right to appeal the suppression ruling. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
The trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his Alford plea and there was a factual basis for the plea State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 5:25 pm
An Alford plea, based on the Supreme Court's opinion in North Carolina v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 6:46 am
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Plea agreement In 2014, pursuant to a plea agreement with the State, Darryl Adamson, Jr., appellant, entered an Alford plea to second-degree murder and use of a handgun in the commission of a felony or crime of violence. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm
Alford (Harvard University)Dr. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 9:53 am
Victor V. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:20 am
The State Supreme Court’s postponed all in-person hearings indefinitely until this pandemic ends. [read post]
