Search for: "State v. Alsup"
Results 41 - 60
of 210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2018, 2:57 pm
The NFL prevails in the district court on a motion to dismiss, with Judge Alsup of the Northern District finding the claims preempted by federal labor law (since there was a CBA that covered the players during this period). [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:23 am
(Judge O'Malley at 53:42)Judge Alsup and Google relied heavily on Sega v. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 8:55 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 4:39 pm
Late last month, as part of the proceedings in the high-profile and ongoing Waymo v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:37 am
Electronic Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 1:40 pm
The State Bar of Texas Board of Directors voted September 24 to approve Joe Escobedo Jr. of Edinburg and Cindy V. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 11:45 am
Many employers with operations in California may already be familiar with Frlekin v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:33 pm
Padayachi v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:57 pm
The Waymo v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:28 am
Case citation: Dangaard v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 5:30 am
As the Court of Appeal in Vescovi v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 2:37 pm
* A funny anecdote about Judge Alsup. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
The outcome in Trump v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
From Finjan, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 10:40 pm
"The Court takes no position on whether a prosecution is or is not warranted, a decision entirely up to the United States Attorney," Alsup wrote. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm
Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
As Judge Alsup stated, Waymo could not treat the two as "fungible targets. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:25 am
AsIs v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:21 am
One month and one week after the appellate opinion was handed down in the Oracle v. [read post]