Search for: "State v. Alvis" Results 41 - 60 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 1:45 am by Laura Sandwell
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 18 – 19 June 2012. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:11 am
Alvi's Drift Wine International v. von Stiehl Winery, Cancellation No. 92058100 (September 12, 2014) [not precedential}.Respondent asserted that NAUGHTY GIRL does not immediately convey any knowledge about the ingredients, qualities, functions, features or characteristics of wine. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
R (on the application of Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:29 am
The SPC Blog carries a hot-off-the-press piece from victorious law firm Powell Gilbert following judgment in Eli Lilly v Human Genome Science. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm by Eric Goldman
As a double-insult, 512(f) preempts related state law claims over abusive takedown notices, so it actually leaves victims worse off than if 512(f) didn’t exist by clearing out the field. [read post]
28 May 2012, 2:33 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
; see Varo, Inc. v Alvis PLC, 261 AD2d 262, 264-265 [1999], lv denied 95 NY2d 767 [2000]). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
Travis used a wheelchair and was transported in a medical transportation van run by We Care Transportation Services and driven by We Care employee Alvis Haadee. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:36 am by Sam Murrant
In Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33 case, the Supreme Court decided that “rule” was to have the widest possible meaning, to avoid confusion and excessive litigation (which had prevailed prior to this decision). [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm by firemarkVA
Jenni Alvies is a non-affiliate who began posting on Facebook under the name “Crossfit Mamas” (selling exercise apparel bearing the same name), and CrossFit felt Alvies was infringing its mark. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by John Elwood
  The Court, however, denied cert. without comment in Alvis v. [read post]