Search for: "State v. American Can Company" Results 61 - 80 of 7,302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2010, 2:56 pm by Vicki Shiah
For more information on emerging climate change law and policy, contact Jeff Gracer. [1] The petitioners are American Electric Power Company, Inc., its subsidiary American Electric Power Service Corporation, Duke Energy, Southern Company, and Xcel Energy. [2] The named plaintiffs were American Electric Power Company, Inc., its subsidiary American Electric Power Service Corporation, Cinergy Corporation (since merged into Duke Energy),… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:08 am
The publishing company alleged that by American Buddha posting four books on the Internet, it violated copyrights in works that it had published. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:33 am by Eric Goldman
Vimeo Russia Fucked With American Democracy, But It Can’t Fuck With Section 230–Federal Agency of News v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:19 am by D. Brad Hughes, Esq.
  As technology expands sales of many United States companies outside of the United States the Lanham Act can be an effective tool to combat the sale of forgeries. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:58 am by Deepak Gupta
Concepcion, the Supreme Court will decide whether companies can use the fine print of contracts to ban class actions by consumers or employees for discriminatory, fraudulent, or deceptive practices. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 2:00 pm by Eric Goldman
Vimeo Russia Fucked With American Democracy, But It Can’t Fuck With Section 230–Federal Agency of News v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:46 pm
Plaintiffs claim that global warming, to which Defendants contribute as the "five largest emitters of carbon dioxide in the United States and . . . among the largest in the world," Connecticut v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 11:19 am by Wystan Ackerman
A question pertaining to whether depreciation can properly be applied to labor costs was certified by Minnesota’s federal district court to the state supreme court. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:24 am by Eric Goldman
Vimeo Russia Fucked With American Democracy, But It Can’t Fuck With Section 230–Federal Agency of News v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 6:52 am by Kathryn Ray
American Home Assurance Company,2 the trial court made the distinction that when applying the test of “clearly relevant,” there exists a distinction between employees whose conduct is directly involved and other employees. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm by Robert M. Jaworski
(“First American”) in which she alleged that First American violated the anti-kickback provision in RESPA by purchasing minority interests in various title agencies in return for their agreement to enter into an exclusive agency arrangement with First American Title Insurance Company (“First American Title”), a First American subsidiary. [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:11 pm by WIMS
OneBeacon American Insurance Company (OneBeacon) and American Motorists Insurance Company (AMICO) were insurers of the B.F. [read post]