Search for: "State v. Ames" Results 1 - 20 of 17,954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2008, 9:23 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF; Same v AM; Same v AN; Same v AE [2008] EWCA Civ 1148; [2008] WLR (D) 320 “The Court of Appeal gave guidance on the proper approach to the compatibility with the right to a fair trial in art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of hearings under s 3(10) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 to determine whether the Secretary of State… [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:17 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF: Same v AM; Same v AN; Same v AE Court of Appeal “While as much information as possible, without imperilling national security, should be disclosed to a person subject to a control order, it was arguable that there was no irreducible minimum the nondisclosure of which would automatically make a trial unfair. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 1:26 pm by Barry Aronin
The Honorable Judge Linda Singer Stein opined that State Farm’s policy and procedures were vague and ambiguous as to whether it could reduce payment… Read more → The post CASE REVIEW: PAN AM DIAGNOSTIC V. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:56 am by traceydennis
HH (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; AM (Somalia) v Same; J (Somalia) v Same; MA (Somalia) v Same; [2010] EWCA Civ 42; ; [2010] WLR (D) 107 “Where the route and manner of return of an illegal immigrant to a safe haven were known or could be implied, the first tier tribunal had to consider whether the claimant would be put at risk if returned by that route. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:06 am by traceydennis
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; SM (Zimbabwe) v Same; AM (Zimbabwe) v Same; DM (Zimbabwe) v Same [2010] EWCA Civ 1285; [2010] WLR (D) 295 “A claim for asylum would not be defeated if the tribunal found that a claimant would be willing to lie about political beliefs, or about the absence of political beliefs, but that the reason for the lie was to avoid persecution. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:01 am
Regina (AM and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another Court of Appeal “Allegations of inhuman or degrading treatment of inmates at a privately run immigration detention centre should have been investigated by the Secretary of State for the Home Department to meet the United Kingdom's obligation under article 3 of the [...] [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 6:53 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Right to speedy trial — Failure to show prejudice A jury empaneled in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County convicted appellant Dietrich Ames of sexual abuse of a minor (Count 1), second-degree assault (Count 3), and fourth-degree sex offense (Count 4) for inappropriate contact with a fifteen-year old girl. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:07 am by sally
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening); SM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening); AM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening); KM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening) [2012] UKSC 38; [2012] WLR (D) 226 “A claim for asylum should not be defeated on the ground that an individual who had no political views, and who therefore did not support the persecutory regime in his… [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 2:10 am
Regina (AM)(Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “An asylum-seeker's in-country appeal against removal on human rights grounds could not be stifled by the later issue of a certificate by the Secretary of State for the Home Department that the opposition was clearly unfounded. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:49 am
From the sounds of the on-the-ground reports I am getting, it seems that United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:46 am
R(AM)(Cameroon) v Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (No 2) , Secretary of State for the Home Department as interested party [2008] EWCA Civ 100; [2008] WLR (D) 57 “Where a statutory review of an immigration appeal mistakenly went ahead before a judicial review application establishing a good arguable case had been heard resulting in a final determination, that determination should be set aside and the judicial review proceed. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:02 am by Bill
State of New York view the post-New Deal decisions which repudiated Lochner the way I view Bush v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 5:02 am
I understand that CAAF is having some trouble with its web site, so I am posting this link to CAAF's decision from yesterday in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:58 am by Immigration Prof
At 10:00 AM ET today, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) and House Democratic leaders will hold a press conference on the United States v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 2:20 pm
Additional state law claims are also pending against the company, brought by women experiencing serious problems with vaginal mesh products manufactured by AMS. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am by Eric Goldman
Also because of the combination, FOSTA enabled a Section 230 exclusion for civil claims for state commercial sex promotions but not for state sex trafficking claims. [read post]