Search for: "State v. Ames"
Results 161 - 180
of 18,561
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Ever since, the MC99 provisions have been an integral part of the EU legal order (C-344/04 IATA and ELFAA, para. 36), save for the provisions on cargo, for which competence rests with the EU Member States. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:19 am
See Weinberger v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
I am disappointed, however, that the Supreme Court dodged the more important question: whether the discovery rule applies at all. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am
Throughout the next week, Chesebro and Troupis continued to text about the emergent scheme, with Chesebro very much assuming the role of a junior associate (“[I] did a memo, which I hope I can get to you securely”) to Troupis as senior partner (“[I am] headed to Washington in the AM to brief the White House. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:27 am
” (citing Am. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
Last year, the state court ruled in favor of the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
The third focuses cognitive control of target populations of competitor or target states (and other collectives) connected to "cold war. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
9 May 2024, 3:59 pm
I am not sure I am convinced by Judge Eid's analysis. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am
Am., 219 AD2d 454, 454 [1st Dept 1995], lv denied 87 NY2d 804 [1995]; see Ewald v Erie Ins. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
SCARFE J.P., R. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
SCARFE J.P., R. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
If a government official identifies themselves as such on their account, but lacks the authority to act on behalf of the state, there is no state action. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
I am not sure the plaintiff will win in the end, but they are making more progress than expected. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
[UPDATE 5/3/24, 11:55 am: This paragraph has been revised in light of the archived version (which I hadn't been able to find when I first put up the post); thanks to commenter ReadMyLips88, who pointed me to the archived version.] [read post]