Search for: "State v. Anderson" Results 101 - 120 of 1,939
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm by Unknown
We also reject Dey's argument that Anderson effectively signed the interlineations by attaching a Post-it® note to the documents he sent to his attorney, on which he stated: "Hi Scott, [¶] Here they are. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 1:29 pm by anbrandon
Anderson, 695 F.3d 390 (6th Cir. 2012), but it ignores cases like United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 11:18 am
For the reasons briefly and succinctly stated therein, I agree wholeheartedly with Judge Wardlaw’s opinion concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:10 pm
All of this even assuming that the latter tribunal even has recent-graduate law clerks, which often do not exist in the state tribunals in which many of the previous tattoo cases have been heard.All of this is a way of saying that, in addition to friends with tattoos, I think that clerks with tattoos -- which, for many judges, may be their principal professional exposure to the practice -- might well have a fairly big impact on how a judge might view cases like this one. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 10:30 am by Vanessa Sauter
Lawfare contributor and University of Texas law professor Stephen Vladeck argued before the Supreme Court last week in United States v. [read post]