Search for: "State v. Anil"
Results 1 - 20
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2015, 6:13 am
Hanen's preliminary injunction ruling in Texas v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:06 am
Anil Kalhan (here and here) continues the discussion and analysis of United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 11:06 pm
In Bhavnagar University v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:03 am
In the case of State of Orissa v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:16 am
In Free Holdings v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 2:57 am
We don't know, but in Lee v Pierre 2011 NY Slip Op 32911(U); November 1, 2011; Supreme Court, New York County;Docket Number: 403536/10; Judge: Anil C. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
By Anil Kalhan Last week, Chicago Mayor (and former Obama White House Chief of Staff) Rahm Emanuel reentered the national political fray, advising Mitt Romney that he should “stop whining” about the attention being given to his record at the helm — or was it “retroactively” not at the helm? [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:06 pm
Goyal v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am
A recent decision by a Manhattan trial judge in Holdrum Investments, N.V. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 12:00 pm
Daniel Green v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 8:02 am
Facts: This case (Eshelman v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 8:25 am
“Responding to Fisher v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 6:25 am
Lepore, Water Grabbing and Water Rights: Indigenous ‘Sovereignty’ v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:04 am
V Sudish Pai, Mrs. [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:32 am
In Lewis v Alcobi, 2017 NY Slip Op 30664(U) [Sup Ct NY County Apr. 6, 2017], Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Anil C. [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:32 am
In Lewis v Alcobi, 2017 NY Slip Op 30664(U) [Sup Ct NY County Apr. 6, 2017], Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Anil C. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:57 am
This summer, she goes to trial in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 8:22 pm
A recent post by V. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
This is the first successful legal challenge to AFR technology and an important decision in relation to the regulation of state surveillance. [read post]
