Search for: "State v. Apodaca"
Results 1 - 20
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2020, 10:50 am
Louisiana[1] was an unremarkable end to the anachronistic Apodaca v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 11:49 am
Part I includes a discussion of Apodaca v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:14 pm
The petition asks the Court to extend the Sixth Amendment's unanimous jury requirement to the states and to overrule Apodaca v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:24 am
In 1972, the Supreme Court ruled in Apodaca v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:16 pm
Louisiana, the Supreme Court overruled Apodaca v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 6:02 am
Here’s the basic issue: In Apodaca v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:27 pm
In Apodaca v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 6:50 pm
The National Law Journal just ran a story on a new effort to get the Supreme Court to re-visit its decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
In the course of the briefing, lead counsel Seth Waxman distinguished Apodaca v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:30 pm
Under the landmark Supreme Court decision, Katz v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:44 pm
So you might think that people like Apodaca would be thankful that he only got two years in prison, as opposed to eight or nine. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 7:45 am
In Apodaca v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:05 am
In Apodaca v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 10:46 am
This important, timely and comprehensive guide to keeping your plans private through every step of an abortion in any state, including Florida and South Dakota is by Tomas Apodaca. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:13 am
The petitioners argue that the United States Supreme Court should overrule its decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:31 pm
Ramos expands Apodaca to cover the states. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:00 am
The Court previously upheld the Oregon approach (which, like Louisiana but unlike the 48 other states, allows "split-verdicts") in Apodaca v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:38 am
The majority also addressed its decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
