Search for: "State v. Armstrong" Results 181 - 200 of 683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2009, 4:01 am
However, as the Court of Appeals indicated in Antinore v State, 40 NY2d 6, a collective bargaining agreement may provide for alternatives to the statutory provisions provided such modifications are consistent with administrative due process.The full text of the Commissioners decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.counsel.nysed.gov] [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:09 am
All other charges are to be heard by a single hearing officer.** As the Court of Appeals indicated in Antinore v State, 40 NY2d 6, a collective bargaining agreement may provide for alternatives to the statutory provisions provided such modifications are consistent with administrative due process.The full text of the Commissioners decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.counsel.nysed.gov/Decisions/volume48/d15850.htm [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
However, as the Court of Appeals indicated in Antinore v State, 40 NY2d 6, a collective bargaining agreement may provide for alternatives to the statutory provisions provided such modifications are consistent with administrative due process.The full text of the Commissioners decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.counsel.nysed.gov] [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 9:35 am
The Court heard argument on Monday in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:00 pm by Michael McCann
NCAA (and the paying of college athletes), whether the NCAA should have punished Penn State, Title IX, morals clauses (including with Lance Armstrong) etc. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:53 am by Victoria VanBuren
Tygart | Texas Federal Court Will Hear Lance Armstrong Case on August 10, Disputing, July 18, 2012 Armstrong v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 10:03 am by Nick Armstrong
Nick Armstrong is junior counsel for Mr Gourlay. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Rachael Hanna
On July 20, the Ninth Circuit declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:30 am by Amy Howe
  Briefly: At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses the Court’s recent opinion in Armstrong v. [read post]