Search for: "State v. Arnold" Results 21 - 40 of 1,495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 3:08 pm by Lawrence Solum
Supreme Court in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
 At the end of last month Mr Justice Arnold handed down not one, but two decisions in the Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz dispute (see previous Kat report here). [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:01 am by Lauren Wood, Olswang LLP
      [1] Arnold v Britton & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 902 (22 July 2013), para 45 [2] Ibid, para 50 [3] Ibid, para 57 [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 4:08 am
Arnold, No. 06-50581 (4-21-08). [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 9:00 pm
On Friday 14 November, Mr Justice Arnold delivered his judgment in Armour Group Plc v Leisuretech Electronics Pty Ltd [2008] EWHC 2797 (now available from BAILII here). [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:59 pm
 Read with a plummy Joanna Lumley voice, Mr Arnold's decision in Actavis v Lilly [2016] EWHC 234 may be just the thing to set the mood for a romantic candlelight dinner (although, some may say it is a mood killer depending what side you are on). [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:34 am by Ben Millson (Bristows)
Turning to de minimis, Arnold LJ noted that it was common ground that his own statement of the law in Napp v Dr Reddy’s [2016] EWHC 1517 (Pat) was accurate, and analysed whether three “groups” of infringement were de minimis. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 10:55 pm by Administrator
  The docket now reflects that, since the Perry case began, Jerry Brown has replaced Arnold Schwarzenegger as California’s governor, and former San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris has replaced Brown as the state’s attorney general. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am by Rose Hughes
 Windsurfer/Pozzoli thus applied by Arnold LJ does not require the "state of the art" to represent the closest prior art. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 11:46 pm by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
With regards to the allegation of uncertainty, Arnold LJ applied the recent Court of Appeal judgment in Anan Kasei v Neo. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
The only European authority on "staple commercial products" cited was a Patents County Court decision in Pavel v Sony Corporation where HHJ Ford stated that a "staple commercial product is a commodity or raw material". [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
Summary of Decision issued February 24, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 6:04 pm
The Ninth Circuit has (finally) handed down United States v. [read post]