Search for: "State v. Aston" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2007, 2:32 pm
Musing over the Court of Appeal judgment ([2007] EWCA Civ 236) today, it struck me that the case does something rather dramatic to the issue of tolerated trespassers, extending the thrust of Swindon v Aston [2003] HLR 610. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Back when I first started this blog, when I believed that my blogging success would translate into Aston Martins and beach homes, rather than “Can you please email me a copy of your FMLA PowerPoint? [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:41 am by Joy
This position was considered by Justice Aston in Vanderhoek v Stark, [1999] O.J. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 3:15 pm
I was scanning the Court of Appeal judgments, waiting for White v Knowsley, when this came up: London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Ansell [2007] EWCA Civ 326 Now that is interesting. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
  Mr Aston described the claimant as a “feminist cretin” and said that she “set fire to people’s money”. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:12 am
 In 'Zervos v Picasso, or copyright v droit d'auteur' , GuestKat Antonella Gentile offers a post on the decision in Zervos v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 7:26 pm by John A. Gallagher
Cmwlth. 2000) (holding that claimant who quit to return to another state to care for his emotionally disturbed child was eligible for benefits); Miksic v. [read post]