Search for: "State v. Aston"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2007, 2:32 pm
Musing over the Court of Appeal judgment ([2007] EWCA Civ 236) today, it struck me that the case does something rather dramatic to the issue of tolerated trespassers, extending the thrust of Swindon v Aston [2003] HLR 610. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
In Darren Bent v (1) Highways and Utilities Construction Ltd; (2) Allianz Insurance Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 292, the Court of Appeal was asked to order a retrial of the first instance decision of Mr Justice Yelton sitting in Cambridge County Court.The case concerned the hire in February 2007, by Darren Bent (the Sunderland and England striker), of an Aston Martin DB9, worth approximately £105,000, following an accident caused by an Allianz policyholder which resulted in damage to… [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
In Darren Bent v (1) Highways and Utilities Construction Ltd; (2) Allianz Insurance Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 292, the Court of Appeal was asked to order a retrial of the first instance decision of Mr Justice Yelton sitting in Cambridge County Court.The case concerned the hire in February 2007, by Darren Bent (the Sunderland and England striker), of an Aston Martin DB9, worth approximately £105,000, following an accident caused by an Allianz policyholder which resulted in damage to… [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:32 pm
Aston, 2018 U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
Back when I first started this blog, when I believed that my blogging success would translate into Aston Martins and beach homes, rather than “Can you please email me a copy of your FMLA PowerPoint? [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:26 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Doyle & Ors v R [2012] EWCA Crim 995 (16 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rehill v Rider Holdings Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 628 (16 May 2012) Sulamerica CIA Nacional De Seguros SA & Ors v Enesa Engenharia SA & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 638 (16 May 2012) Sucafina SA v Rotenberg [2012] EWCA Civ 637 (16 May 2012) JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov [2012] EWCA Civ 639 (16 May 2012) Durden v Aston [2012]… [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 2:56 am
See Aston v. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm
United States was re-argued on its 80th anniversary in an event sponsored by the Robert H. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 8:43 pm
As set forth by Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court in its 2009 decision in Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Supreme Court decided Thompson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:01 am
’ United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
Unifund,[5] and the same is true of other states. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
Forthcoming lecture on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank Aston Law School has organised a lecture by Mark Hill KC to be given at the parish church of St John the Baptist, Aston Cantlow, on Monday, 4 September, on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37, the leading case on chancel repair liability. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 3:15 pm
I was scanning the Court of Appeal judgments, waiting for White v Knowsley, when this came up: London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Ansell [2007] EWCA Civ 326 Now that is interesting. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:07 pm
The complaint states that plaintiffs John M. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/839921.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
In a case before a Texas state court in 2015, Ford said the Plano office was "the principal office of Ford in the State of Texas. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
Francis of Philadelphia (Aston, Pennsylvania), and Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus & Mary, U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
