Search for: "State v. Atkins" Results 1 - 20 of 646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
His view is in direct opposition to the recent decision in the 10th Circuit in US v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 7:42 am
In 2002, the Supreme Court ruled the death penalty unconstitutional for offenders with mental retardation in the case Atkins v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 9:59 pm
More federalism in administering Atkins When the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 2:58 am
Last Friday, Jan. 18th, the ILB reported that the Supreme Court had denied transfer in the case of Guardianship of Patrick Atkins, Brett Conrad v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 8:11 am by Steve Hall
The Atkins decision gave states substantial latitude in how to carry it... [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 2:26 pm
Blume asserted that Ashe v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:17 pm by Paul M. Rashkind
A State court’s determination that a defendant’s mental retardation was a mitigating factor in the penalty phase of a capital case does not trigger Double Jeopardy issue preclusion, and foreclose the question whether, in the wake of the subsequently-decided decision in Atkins v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 5:57 pm
  The piece is titled "Of Atkins and Men: Deviations from Clinical Definitions of Mental Retardation in Death Penalty Cases", and here is the abstract: Under Atkins v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:10 am
I recently noted here that states have developed, and struggled with, a wide array of "ways to enforce the constitutional restriction" on executing mentally retarded offenders as required by the Supreme Court's 2002 Atkins decision. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:49 am by Jon Sands
Schriro, Nos. 96-99025, 96-99026, 10-99011 (Reinhardt with Schroeder, dissent by Callahan) --- The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's denial of an Arizona state prisoner's claim that he was ineligible to be executed under Atkins v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:46 am
" As some readers may know, states have implemented Atkins in a variety of ways (which was to be expected when the Supreme Court in Atkins expressly left it to the states to administer is broad and vague holding). [read post]