Search for: "State v. Atwood"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2022, 2:35 pm
Shortly after the court issued three brief orders denying Atwood’s final appeals, the state executed Atwood, 66, by lethal injection. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 11:06 pm
In Atwood v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm
Atwood’s literary works. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:36 am
In Painter v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:06 pm
Atwood v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:08 am
In Atwood v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
United States and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
United States and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
"It was a hate crime and that's exactly what should be on his record forever," Atwood said. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
His discussion of NAACP v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm
In light of this week’s leak of Samuel Alito’s draft opinion by which the Supreme Court will soon overrule Roe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:49 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) SL (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1063 (19 September 2008) US (Nepal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1057 (10 September 2008) LA (Uganda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1055 (10 September 2008) NR (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1053 (10 September 2008) MQ… [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Atwood v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:54 am
Dunlap, of Pierce Atwood LLP (Ralph Lancaster’s firm). [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:58 pm
Voyager Pharmaceutical Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
" The issue raised on appeal is whether Supreme Court properly struck respondent's unverified answer (see Matter of Atwood v Pridgen, 142 AD3d 1278, 1279 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 945 [2016]).Petitioners failed to reject respondent's answer and deem it a nullity based upon the lack of a verification (see CPLR 3022). [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
" The issue raised on appeal is whether Supreme Court properly struck respondent's unverified answer (see Matter of Atwood v Pridgen, 142 AD3d 1278, 1279 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 945 [2016]).Petitioners failed to reject respondent's answer and deem it a nullity based upon the lack of a verification (see CPLR 3022). [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 12:18 pm
In Gamble v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:56 pm
In Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
