Search for: "State v. Austin" Results 1 - 20 of 2,236
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
”Similarly, the Republican Secretary of State in Georgia has thus far stood up to the bizarre call for him to step down from that state’s two Republican senators, but he might yet do so. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 12:58 pm by Sam Callahan and Allon Kedem
” Assistant to the Solicitor General Austin Raynor, who took up the cause on behalf of the United States, embraced the justices’ suggestion that Section 231g was his ally. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Pro-First Amendment group challenges University of Texas at Austin campus speech code, alleging that its vague terms chill protected speech. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
They did so where the recount included some votes in the state and excluded others, a circumstance hardly likely to recur.Moreover, had there been an objection to the Florida electors presented to Congress, Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
UT Austin does, however, strongly encourage all its users to be polite and courteous. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
UT Austin does, however, strongly encourage all its users to be polite and courteous. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:10 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Second-degree rape After a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County, Austin Christopher White, appellant, was convicted of sexual abuse of a minor, second-degree rape, and three counts of third-degree sexual offense. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 6:19 am by Chukwuma Okoli
In the very recent case of Yankey v Austin (2020) LPELR-49540(CA)  the Nigerian Court of Appeal was faced with the issue of whether a court in the United State has jurisdiction to make an order affecting immovable property in Lagos, Nigeria. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
Constitution, including most notably the Equal Protection Clause.As noted in Bush v Gore, a state’s determination shall be “conclusive” only if made pursuant to a law “made prior to election day” by which the “state legislature has provided for final determination of contests or controversies . . . . [read post]