Search for: "State v. Austin" Results 481 - 500 of 2,766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
United States, in which the Court made it harder for the federal government to use the fact of a prior criminal conviction to increase a criminal sentence; American Express Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Alan Rozenshtein
A member of the panel then states that, in her opinion, a Bivens cause of action does not require congressional action, and that the government’s argument relies on United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:13 am by Steve Hall
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:40 am
  The Court has issued the following written order: “The parties should address the following question: ‘For the disposition of this case, should the Court overrule either or both Austin v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Rees decision and approved the use of midazolam in 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
   A report on the case of Fisher v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:58 pm
The Austin Court of Appeals held that all the State had to prove for the felon in possession statute was that Tapps was generally a felon and the state jail felony conviction means he's a felon. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:45 am by Lawrence Solum
In the years since Marshall’s 1833 ruling in United States v. [read post]